Holly Valance and Cold Fusion
Though the analogy might seem incongruous, Australian pop
music star, Holly Valance, is a useful mnemonic for what’s problematic about
human nature’s desire for a clean source of atomic energy. Early models of
energy involved the use of fissionable materials, that is, atom-splitting, as
with A-bombs, releasing heat through chemical reaction, whereas cold fusion,
requiring almost no initial heat, constitutes a frozen explosion, dissipating when
thawed, as utilizable energy. Having a body that thaws, Holly was a traditional
‘sex bomb’ for males; producing a ‘chain reaction’ in terms of ‘nuclear’
energy, where the dads in the ‘nuclear families’, each in their own epicentre,
then became more energetic.
The phenomenon is
best illustrated in the Diana Ross song, ‘Chain Reaction’ (1985), in which the
singer, formerly with the girl trio, The
Supremes (1967-70), proclaims, ‘I’m in the middle of a chain reaction.’1
The belief that men are at the centre of the family, where women initiate the
release of energy, as ‘sex bombs’, has negative connotations. Where frozen
energy, at the centre of such a nuclear family is thawed, the correlation is
with ‘cold fusion’, whereas ‘Cold War warriors’, for example, were taught
‘Armageddon’, as the last battle between good and evil.
Due to take place,
according to the Bible, near the
Middle East’s coastal city of Haifa, modern Israel, by ‘the hill of Megiddo’ (Rev: 16.16), the forces of good were to
be led by the Jewish rabbi, Jesus, ‘heart’ of the Christian religion, according
to his disciple John’s apocalyptic Revelation
of the future. However, Jesus was executed, ‘on the hill of Calvary’, outside the
city of Jerusalem there, with warmongering John’s prophecy of his ‘Second Coming’
to the Earth, as the basis for belief in the future.
The Cold War, designed
to delay such a future ‘hot war’, cold fusion, reducing the danger and cost of
nuclear power, became intrinsic to the peace equation, whereas John’s distilled
vision is, ‘Out of … [Jesus’] mouth came a sharp sword.’ (Rev: 19.15) Jesus is the rule of law, which he formulated as, ‘Love
your neighbour as you love yourself.’ (Mk:
12. 31) That includes masturbation, as well as sex between women, as women’s
seed, whereas men advocate blindness to these human activities, ‘Men cursed the
God of heaven for their pains and their sores, but refused to repent of what
they had done.’ (Rev: 16. 11) What
they did was infantilize. Humans should be blind to human nature, and blinded,
according to men, as a punishment for needing to see in order to be adults. Paedophiles
make it hell for others, and paradise for themselves, with the crime of
rejuvenation, through medical science, likely to incur the punishment of
euthanasia; for being old enough to know what heaven is for adults.
During the period of
what was known as the ‘Soviet Empire’, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
(NATO) was formed by the West. With those nations capable of delivering a
nuclear deterrent, that is, intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMS) armed
with atomic warheads, to Russia’s territorial ambitions. At the forefront of
its ‘dad’s army’, France, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States of
America (USA), believed in reacting explosively to an Eastern Europe enchained,
after WWII (1939-45). Refusing to withdraw from the nation states it’d occupied
en route to capturing the German
capital, Berlin, Russia had kept them under its own ‘nuclear umbrella’ as
‘soviet’ slave satellites.
The collapse of the
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), as the countries of Eastern Europe,
through economic pressure from the West, known as the ‘Cold War’ (1947-91),
became independent, and the USSR was replaced by the Russian Federation in
1990, seemed to coincidentally coincide with the video age of ‘hot bodies’,
like pop star Holly Valance’s. Recorded for television audiences, pouting and
gyrating in ever more revealing costumes designed to release pent up sexual
energy in the viewer.
The Sex Bomb Age (13-19)
devastated the nuclear family in that older women couldn’t compete with what
was evidently unavailable, while channelling that sexual ‘libido’, as Swiss
psychologist Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961) observed, into the husbanding of a ‘small
farm’, or intellectual endeavor to
further technological development, proving suitable to economists, resulted in
a status quo heavily dependent on
sublimation. However, what was being sublimated?
The sun itself is
actually an uncontrolled series of Hydrogen-based nuclear explosions, already lasting
for some billions of years, while the atomic ‘fission’ bomb, with ‘the power of
a sun’, although not a Hydrogen H-bomb, developed later, was used in the
Pacific theatre, by the US, to end Japan’s involvement, as an Axis Power, with
its WWII allies; Germany and Italy in Europe. Named ‘Little Boy’, splitting
Uranium-235 atoms to initiate the chemistry between the sun and its mother, the
Earth, the bomb was dropped on August 6th, 1945, over the city of
Hiroshima, destroying most of it, by the B-29 superfortress aircraft, named
Enola Gay; after the pilot’s mother.
The analogy is of the
son’s belief in the mother, according to Freudian psychiatry, devised by
Austria’s ‘father of psychoanalysis, Sigmund Freud (1856-1939), that is, Japan
was a different mother. However, as the Japanese are perceived as a different
race, ‘the yellow man’, as opposed to the white, according to pop star Bruce
Springsteen’s song, ‘Born in the U.S.A.’ (1984), the actual separation, between
the father and the mother, is that Japan’s father is different, although it’s the
mother, by the ‘power of a son’, that’s destroyed:
‘Sent me off to a foreign land
To go and kill the yellow man’2
Atoms combine to
produce molecules, for example, hydrogen (H2) and oxygen (O2) are always that,
but combine to produce water. While water can be gaseous, as heat can be
applied to induce a further molecular reaction, H2 and oxygen O2 are always
that. However, if water is not heated, steam won’t result. That weak molecular
combinations need to be protected, that is, water needn’t evaporate, has its
counterpart in the human realm.
After the 1989
announcement of a successful cold fusion experiment by electrochemists, Martin Fleischmann
and Stanley Pons, at the US’ University of Utah, Salt Lake city, with anomalous
amounts of heat from deuterium (D), scientists could not replicate the results.
The requirements for nuclear fusion, according with French physicist, Charles
Augustin Coulomb’s ‘barrier’ hypothesis (1785), is extreme heat and pressure. The
overcoming of electrically charged particles at rest, denies the possibility of
at or near room temperature cold fusion. However, as physicists have observed
such ‘party girls’ behaving differently, when they look at them, consciousness
has qualitative significance.
A patrilineal
paradigm determines how physicists perceive what is connectable, which might be
defined as the holy prevalence; or, in terms of the argument, the pre-Valance,
that is, before Holly, who was the pop star that wowed the 2002 music world with
‘Kiss Kiss’. That cold fusion is ‘hidden’ is allied to matrilineal ascent. Looking
at Valance’s bikini line, in the promotional video, heat-generating Valance can
only receive, rather than positively communicate her electrical discharge, that
is, she doesn’t have penis semen of her own to fertilize an ovum; at least
according to the prevailing universe model:
When you look at me tell me what do you see
This is what you get it's the way I am.’3
That kissing requires
physical desire might seem an innocuous observation, but initial heat is required
to start, and continue the process. The argument for cold fusion is that it’s
‘hidden’, because hard-to-reproduce, whereas it’s more likely that it’s occult,
that is, humans are blinded by interested parties, who want the benefits of the
party girls’ energy to themselves.
Whereas research into
nuclear fuel often entails assurances that the system of nuclear fusion does
not trigger a nuclear explosion of the sort experienced by the citizens of
Hiroshima, and later by those of Nagasaki, on August 9th, 1945, when
the B-29 superfortress, Bockscar, dropped the Plutonium-239 fission A-bomb, ‘Fat
Man’, over that Japanese city, cold fusion is ‘pariah science’, as the
prevailing scientific paradigm predetermines its manifest failure.
That this is built
into the picture is likely to be the US’ perceived ‘Manifest Destiny’, which is
their belief in that nation’s innate superiority, for example, after Japan’s
quelling the US’ invasion of East Asia began to prevent soviet-style China from
dominating the region, and brides from Asia were de rigeur, as the ‘big melting pot’ began to look for rice to
supplement its own. With the fall of the US-backed Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza
Pahlavi, in 1979, US’ subsequent invasions, of the Middle East and Africa, for
burkas to supplement its own Moslem nation of Islam’s, was perceived as
secondary to its thirst for oil, as fuel for its industries, as well as its transport
system of airplanes, trains, and automobiles, whereas what was inside the
burkas at McDonald’s was the key.
The prevailing paradigm
of nuclear physics is heterosexual, or homosexual, that is, atoms chemically combine
in foreseeable ways, in accordance with what is known as the ‘Periodic Table of
Elements’, organizing all (known) 118 elements by their atomic number (number
of nucleons with electrically positive charges; called protons: as distinct
from negatively charged electrons). Last updated in 2016, with created elements
that test hypotheses about the physical universe, although elements per se aren’t perceived as male and
female, they nevertheless cannot combine unless they are combined with, which
suggests that perceptions of negative and positive, protons and neutrons, as
male and female, though deemed sufficient to describe a male centred universe, isn’t.
As neutrons can ‘convert’ and become protons, females become male.
As nature is as God
intended, a look at the Bible is
useful for physics. The creator, God, told the woman, Eve, in the paradise of
Eden, after she and Adam, the first man created by God, were expelled for
rejecting God’s ‘fruit of the tree of life’, which was immortality, her ‘seed’
would prevail, ‘You shall crush the head of the serpent with your foot, but he
will bruise your heel.’ (Gen: 3. 15)
The angel, Satan, was turned into a serpent for persuading Eve to accept ‘the
fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil’, which was forbidden by
God, as it was death to taste it.
The Talmud and Torah
of Judaism, which is the law and history of the Jews, is the Old Testament of the Bible according to Christianity, superseded
by Jesus’ New Testament teaching, ‘Love
your neighbour as you love yourself.’ (Mk:
12. 31) According to Jewish midrash,
that is, exegesis, Adam was a hermaphrodite, called futanarian in human
biological terms, or futa, that is,
God’s ‘foot’, which implies that Eve, created from the rib, or side, of Adam,
was a self-birth, while also implying that she was a hermaphrodite too.
If both Eve and Adam
were ‘futa’, they represent not only a physical paradigm of the universe,
denied by patrilineal models, but a human consciousness denied its right to
look at the universe to see if it reacts differently under the purview of its
unique vision. English polymath Thomas Young’s 1801 ‘experiment with two holes’
is usually presented as the originating basis in physics for ‘alternative
universe theory’, as when the experimenter is looking, the particle wave
collapses to reveal a single particle, choosing amongst the possible paths
through a hole, to make that path actual.
When the experimenter
is not looking, the wave doesn’t collapse, which implies that, as the rejection
of futanarian women’s seed from the basic fabric of society represents a denial
of human consciousness, it precludes the possibility of cold fusion becoming visible
through ‘other eyes’. Rejecting a genuine basis for universal field theory,
which explains everything, as accepting futa as human consciousness would require
changes to the prevailing scientific paradigm, cold fusion is a possibility
precluded by adherence to the irrationality of male wars for women, and oil,
etc., as the impoverishing of ‘other mothers’, in the racist slaving of women’s
seed, by the sons of differing fathers, is the accepted paradigm for male
science.
Jesus ‘Christ’, the
Messiah of Christianity, as a ‘branch’ of the more ancient Judaism, was executed
by the Roman Empire, during the reign of Tiberius Augustus (17-37 CE), after
being caught with a woman by his disciple, Judas, ‘Leave her alone.’ (Mk: 14. 6) Reported by his disciple, who
was also known for stealing money from the collection plate, following a sermon
by the rabbi, to the Jewish religious police, the Pharisees, Jesus, was nailed
to a cross of wood, and died there, but experiencing Resurrection and Ascension
to heaven, he was deemed to have broken the curse of death upon Eve’s seed
since Eden.
That Christ’s
immortality was due to his being able to see with women’s eyes has so far
escaped the attention of the mass media. Before his crucifixion, and a
contributing factor to it, as misanthropy was a huge dehumanizing factor in the
suppressing of women’s seed, when a woman was accused of adultery, Jesus said,
‘Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.’ (John: 8. 7) As women’s seed is adulterated by men, that is, aliens
posing as demons, as Jesus demonstrated, when allowing them, in possession of
the body of a man (Mk: 5. 13), to
enter a herd of pigs, which promptly ran off a cliff to drown, in the sea of
Galilee, women aren’t adultery, whereas men are.
God’s seed of Eve is perceivable
as a paradigm for the combining of atomic valences, as well as molecules, representing
the weaker interactions of unstable atomic combining. Hydrogen and oxygen, for
example, combine to produce water, which evaporates when heat is applied. Whereas
hydrogen (H2) and oxygen (O2) are always that, the testing of the weaknesses of
the futa combining, as represented by the figure of Satan, resulted in a
paradigmatic falsehood, which negatively influenced physics’ ability to
describe the universe. Human molecular structure, artificially reduced to
either positive male, or negative female, valences, not only weakens the
prevailing scientific paradigm’s descriptors, as the futaverse of cold fusion in potentiam contains all of those
nascent human valences needed for the constellating of that appearance of God, but
promotes extinction, through sole reliance on hot male power.
If the Valance that
is Holly isn’t hermaphroditic, that doesn’t mean that the human footrace can’t
combine with her, while futanarian humanity can combine with each other. In
simple terms, women’s seed has all of the wombs, and all of the penis, needed
to be a race separate from men. As a form of heat generation, cold perforce, remembered
knowledge of how their species combines sexually, is not only a release of
energy, but the emergence of a qualitatively different human consciousness for
which cold fusion is normative.
The belief that
female valences can’t combine like males prevents the modelling of cheaper
sources of energy technologies. Particles, let’s say, party girls, are atoms
that are both male and female, rather than that there are male and female
atoms, which is a different ‘holy valence’. From the perspective of physics,
immortality through science, resulting from the brainpower produced by Eve’s
seed to crush the head of those born from the seed of the serpent, is their
holy grail.
The vessel used by
Christ at his ‘Last Supper’ with the disciples, before his crucifixion, is symbolic,
‘And he took bread … broke it and gave it to them .., “This is my body, which
is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.”’ (Luke: 22. 19) After instructing the disciples, including Judas, the
betrayer ‘… [Jesus] took a cup, and when he had given thanks he gave it to
them, and they all drank of it. And he said to them, “This is my blood ...”’ (Mk: 14. 23-24) In the Christian church,
the priest offers to the parishioners ‘holy Communion’, as a thin wafer of
bread, and a sip of wine from a goblet, in accordance with Jesus’ promise of an
immortal spirit body, after death.
In France’s Perceval and the Story of the Grail (c. 1182-90) by Chrétien de Troyes, and the
14th century Welsh Mabinogion
of British mythology, as well as England’s Sir Thomas Mallory’s Le Morte D’Arthur (1485), the vessel
used by Christ reappears as the grail, which of all of the knights of king
Arthur seated at le table ronde,
Perceval alone is vouchsafed a glimpse, suggesting his name means ‘the valence
that is pierced’, as not only is women’s seed a hidden secret, but women are a
farm, representing a greater vision.
What is missing from
the physical world is an explanation of how futa ‘fit in’, strongly, so
precluding the necessity of changing the perspective of the explicators. Although
black holes could be perceived as female, as they’re vaginal, the homosexually
transmitted ‘killer disease’, AIDS, and its SARS concomitant, suggest to the investigative
imagination that black holes are homosexual devourers, closely linked to the
fact that such men are anal, while the possibility of both male and female
black holes is precluded by the single male and/or female paradigm.
That ‘wormholes’ are
perceived as representing a means of instantaneous travel between sections of
the universe is an asexual perception, whereas it’s conceivable that such are
male, as the urethra carrying semen, or female, like the fallopian tubes, or
both male and female, representing both urethra and fallopian tubes; as futa. If
a sexual view of God’s creation is being indicated, as basic to a universal
paradigm, it encompasses the human at its centre. The existence of black holes,
as ostensible devourers of the universe, indicates a problem mirrored in the
microcosm as AIDS/SARS; for example. Without a universal understanding of
sexuality, in denying futa’s role within an explicatory paradigm, it’s an occult
preclusion against the finding of a cure.
That the US would
rather war on the Moslem nations of Islam, feigning incuriousness over what the
women there keep under the black one-piece coveralls of their burkas is
symptomatic of a sick explanatory paradigm. Adults are taught that pornography
isn’t educational in terms of human biology. However, if it isn’t clear to
everybody where everything goes, or could/can go, the basis of the US’ war on
Islam isn’t evident, which is that Moslem ‘nuclear’ families have four wives,
as the women reproduce with each other. Then the term ‘nuclear war’ becomes
more comprehensible, as a means of describing a society of ‘nuclear families’, riddled
with AIDS/SARS, because of homosexuality. Revealing what women’s seed, as a
species, look like, would undercut the bases for global armed conflict with
their race, and the flesh inside the burkas, remaining warm, but uncooked, representing
cold fission ships of ‘Oceania’ yet unbuilt.
In the TV serial
comedy, What I Like About You
(2002-2006), Jenny Garth, as the older sister, Val, and Amanda Bynes, as Holly
Tyler, are actresses, who’re sexually literate, ‘What’s more important than
doing it in front of everyone she loves … and Tina.’4 Although not presented as
lesbians on the show, the audience is encouraged to imagine otherwise, as the Holly
valence means everyone Val loves, while Jenny and Amanda aren’t related. In the
absence of the breaking of a societal taboo in fact, where incest is forbidden
to prevent the family of women’s seed from reproducing, for example, Holly,
Val, and Tina, it’s ‘thought crime’ only.
In George Orwell’s 1984 (1949) dystopic novel, Britain, as
‘Airstrip One’, is allied to Oceania, including Holly Valance’s Australia, and
Holly + Val’s US. At war by turns with Eastasia and Eurasia, ‘Freedom is
Slavery’ in Oceanian ‘doublethink’.5 While US’ transvestite ‘TVs’ become
transgender (TG) activists for change constitutes Orwellian fictional ‘thought
crime’ against the states, the actual US’ holocaust of gender determination by
surgical intervention upon futa, as the basis of its heterosexual monogamy +
freak show, is a real denial of its responsibility to women’s seed in Islam and
elsewhere.
Without an understanding
of futa, rather than lesbian, interactivity, women’s seed remains inexplicable.
As a censored, and consequently unavailable aspect of the model for explicating
the universe, it nevertheless underpins the US’ war on Islam. In corresponding
to the impossibility of cold fusion, lesbianism, in denying the futa paradigm
of both male and female valences, in atomic and molecular combination, where
the neutron nucleon is capable of being negative, as well as positive, slows research
into a cheaper source of nuclear energy than the Middle Eastern oil the US had
waged war for. Put simply, rather than explain futa by using the media as an
educative medium for women’s seed to get out their penises to heat up a universe
growing progressively ghoulish, the US would rather have the women of Islam be
just desserts.
1 Barry, Robin and Maurice Gibb ‘Chain Reaction’, Diana
Ross, Eaten Alive, RCA, 1985.
2 Springsteen, Bruce ‘Born In The U.S.A.’, Bruce
Springsteen, Born In The U.S.A.,
Columbia, 1984.
3 Jaimes, Juliette, Sezen Aksu, and Steve Welton-Jaimes ‘Kiss
Kiss’, Holly Valance, Footprints,
London, 2002.
4 Bynes, Amanda as Holly Tyler in ‘I’ve Got A Secret’, Norma
Safford Vela, What I Like About You,
Season 4, Episode 4 (72/86), The WB,
October 7th, 2005.
5 Orwell, George 1984,
Pt I, Ch.1, Harcourt, Brace, & Co., New York, 1949.