Holly Valence and Cold Fusion

Holly Valence and Cold Fusion

 

Though the analogy might seem incongruous, Australian pop music star, Holly Valence, is a useful reference for what’s problematic about human nature’s desire for a clean source of atomic energy. Whereas early models of energy involved the use of fissionable materials, that is, atom-splitting, as with A-bombs, releasing heat through chemical reaction, cold fusion, requiring almost no initial heat, constitutes a frozen explosion, dissipating when thawed, as utilizable energy. Having a body that thaws, Holly was a traditional ‘sex bomb’ for males; producing a ‘chain reaction’ in terms of ‘nuclear’ energy, where the dads in the ‘nuclear families’, each in their own epicentre, then became more energetic.

 The phenomenon is best illustrated in the Diana Ross song, ‘Chain Reaction’ (1985), in which the singer, formerly with the girl trio, The Supremes (1967-70), proclaims, ‘I’m in the middle of a chain reaction.’1 The belief being that men are at the centre of the family, where women initiate the release of energy, as ‘bombs’, which has a negative connotation. What happens exactly is that the frozen energy at the centre of the nuclear family is thawed, which is ‘cold fusion’, whereas ‘Cold War warriors’, for example, were taught ‘Armageddon’, as the last battle between good and evil. Due to take place, according to the Bible, near the Middle East’s coastal city of Haifa, modern Israel, by ‘the hill of Megiddo’ (Rev: 16.16), the forces of good were to be led by the Jewish rabbi, Jesus, ‘heart’ of the Christian religion, according to his disciple John’s apocalyptic Revelation of the future. However, Jesus was executed, ‘on the hill of Calvary’, outside the city of Jerusalem there, with John’s prophecy of his ‘Second Coming’ to the Earth, as the basis for belief in future war.

 The Cold War, designed to delay a ‘hot war’, cold fusion, reducing the danger and cost of nuclear power, is intrinsic to the peace equation, whereas John’s vision is that of a warmonger, ‘Out of … [Jesus’] mouth came a sharp sword.’ (Rev: 19.15) Jesus is the rule of law, which he formulated as, ‘Love your neighbour as you love yourself.’ (Mk: 12. 31) That includes masturbation, as well as sex between women, as women’s seed, whereas men advocate blindness to these human activities, ‘Men cursed the God of heaven for their pains and their sores, but refused to repent of what they had done.’ (Rev: 16. 11) What they’d done is infantilize. Humans should be blind to human nature, and blinded, according to men, as a punishment for needing to see in order to be adults. Paedophiles make it hell for others, and paradise for themselves, with the crime of rejuvenation through medical science likely to incur the punishment of euthanasia for being old enough to know what heaven is for adults.

 During the period of what was known as the ‘Soviet Empire’, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was formed by the West, with those capable of delivering a nuclear deterrent, that is, intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMS) armed with atomic warheads, to Russia’s territorial ambitions, that is, France, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States of America (USA), at the forefront of its ‘dad’s army’, believed in reacting explosively to an Eastern Europe enchained, after WWII (1939-45), by a Russia that refused to withdraw from the nation states it’d occupied en route to capturing the German capital, Berlin, and kept them under its own ‘nuclear umbrella’ as ‘soviet’ slave satellites.

 The collapse of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), as the countries of Eastern Europe, through economic pressure from the West, known as the ‘Cold War’ (1947-91), became independent, and the USSR was replaced by the Russian Federation in 1990, seemed to coincidentally coincide with the video age of ‘hot bodies’, like pop star Holly Valence’s, recorded for television audiences, pouting and gyrating in ever more revealing costumes designed to release sexual energy in the viewer.

 The Sex Bomb Age (13-19) devastated the nuclear family in that older women couldn’t compete with what was evidently unavailable, while channelling that sexual ‘libido’, as Swiss psychologist Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961) observed, into the husbanding of a ‘small farm’, or intellectual endeavor to further technological development, proving suitable to economists, resulted in a status quo heavily dependent on sublimation. However, what was being sublimated?

 The sun itself is actually an uncontrolled series of Hydrogen-based nuclear explosions, already lasting for some billions of years, while the atomic ‘fission’ bomb, with ‘the power of a sun’, although not a Hydrogen H-bomb, developed later, was used in the Pacific theatre, by the United States of America, to end Japan’s involvement, as an Axis Power, with its WWII allies; Germany and Italy in Europe. Named ‘Little Boy’, splitting Uranium-235 atoms to initiate the chemistry between the sun and its mother, the Earth, the bomb was dropped on August 6^th, 1945, over the city of Hiroshima, destroying most of it, by the B-29 superfortress aircraft, named Enola Gay; after the pilot’s mother.

 Atoms combine to produce molecules, for example, hydrogen (H2) and oxygen (O2) are always that, but combine to produce water. While water can be gaseous, as heat can be applied to induce a further molecular reaction, H2 and oxygen O2 are always that. However, if water is not heated, steam won’t result. That weak molecular combinations need to be protected, that is, water needn’t evaporate, has its counterpart in the human realm.

 After the 1989 announcement of a successful cold fusion experiment by electrochemists, Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons, at the US’ University of Utah, Salt Lake city, with anomalous amounts of heat from deuterium (D), scientists could not replicate the results. The requirements for nuclear fusion, according with French physicist, Charles Augustin Coulomb’s ‘barrier’ hypothesis (1785), is extreme heat and pressure. The overcoming of electrically charged particles at rest, denies the possibility of at - or near - room temperature cold fusion. However, as physicists have observed such ‘party girls’ behaving differently, when they look at them, consciousness has qualitative significance.

 A patrilineal paradigm determines how physicists perceive what is connectable, which might be defined as the holy prevalence; or, in terms of the argument, the pre-Valence, that is, before Holly, who was the pop star that wowed the 2002 music world with ‘Kiss Kiss’. That cold fusion is ‘hidden’ is allied to matrilineal ascent. Looking at Valence’s bikini line, in the promotional video, heat-generating Valence can only receive, rather than positively communicate her electrical discharge, that is, she doesn’t have penis semen of her own to fertilize an ovum; at least according to the prevailing universe model:

 

When you look at me tell me what do you see

This is what you get it's the way I am.’2

 

 That kissing requires physical desire might seem an innocuous observation, but initial heat is required to start, and continue the process. The argument for is that it’s ‘hidden’, because hard-to-reproduce, whereas it’s more likely that it’s occult, that is, humans are blinded by interested parties, who want the benefits of the party girls’ energy to themselves.

 Whereas research into nuclear fuel often entails assurances that the system of nuclear fission does not trigger a nuclear explosion of the sort experienced by the citizens of Hiroshima, and later by those of Nagasaki, on August 9^th, 1945, when the B-29 superfortress, Bockscar, dropped the Plutonium-239 fission A-bomb, ‘Fat Man’, over that Japanese city, cold fusion is ‘pariah science’, as the prevailing scientific paradigm predetermines its manifest failure.

 That this is built into the picture is likely to be the US’ perceived ‘Manifest Destiny’, which is their belief in that nation’s innate superiority, for example, after Japan’s quelling the US’ invasion of East Asia began to prevent soviet-style China from dominating the region, and brides from Asia were de rigeur, as the ‘big melting pot’ began to look for rice to supplement its own. With the fall of the US-backed Shah of Iran in 1979, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, US’ subsequent invasions of the Middle East and Africa for burkas to supplement its own Moslem nation of Islam’s was perceived as secondary to its thirst for oil for its industries, as well as its airplanes, trains, and automobiles, whereas what’s inside the burkas at McDonald’s is the key to understanding.

 The prevailing paradigm of nuclear physics is heterosexual, or homosexual, that is, atoms chemically combine in foreseeable ways, in accordance with what is known as the ‘Periodic Table of Elements’, organizing all (known) 118 elements by their atomic number (number of nucleons with electrically positive charges; called protons: as distinct from negatively charged electrons). Last updated in 2016, with created elements that test hypotheses about the physical universe, although elements per se aren’t perceived as male and female, they nevertheless cannot combine unless they are combined with, which suggests that perceptions of negative and positive, protons and neutrons, as male and female, though deemed sufficient to describe a male centred universe, isn’t. As neutrons can ‘convert’ and become protons, females become male.

 As nature is as God intended, a look at the Bible is useful for physics. God told the woman, Eve, in the paradise of Eden, after she and Adam, the first man created by God, were expelled for rejecting God’s ‘fruit of the tree of life’, which was immortality, her ‘seed’ would prevail, ‘You shall crush the head of the serpent with your foot, but he will bruise your heel.’ (Gen: 3. 15) The angel, Satan, was turned into a serpent for persuading Eve to accept ‘the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil’, which was forbidden by God, as it was death to taste it.

 The Talmud and Torah of Judaism, which is the law and history of the Jews, is the Old Testament of the Bible according to Christianity, superseded by the rabbi Jesus’ New Testament teaching, ‘Love your neighbour as you love yourself.’ (Mk: 12. 31) According to Jewish midrash, that is, exegesis, Adam was a hermaphrodite, called futanarian in human biological terms, or futa, that is, God’s ‘foot’, which implies that Eve, created from the rib, or side, of Adam, was a self-birth, while also implying that she was a hermaphrodite too.

 If both Eve and Adam were ‘futa’, they represent not only a physical paradigm of the universe, denied by patrilineal models, but a human consciousness denied its right to look at the universe to see if it reacts differently under the purview of its unique vision. English polymath Thomas Young’s 1801 ‘experiment with two holes’ is usually presented as the originating basis in physics for ‘alternative universe theory’, as when the experimenter is looking, the particle wave collapses to reveal a single particle, choosing amongst the possible paths through a hole, to make that path actual.

 When the experimenter is not looking, the wave doesn’t collapse, which implies that, as the rejection of futanarian women’s seed from the basic fabric of society represents a denial of human consciousness, it precludes the possibility of cold fusion becoming visible through ‘other eyes’. Rejecting a genuine basis for universal field theory, which explains everything, as accepting futa as human consciousness would require changes to the prevailing scientific paradigm, cold fusion is a possibility precluded by adherence to the irrationality of male wars for women, and oil, etc., as the slavery of impoverishment.

 Jesus ‘Christ’, the Messiah of Christianity, as a ‘branch’ of the more ancient Judaism, was executed by the Roman Empire, during the reign of Tiberius Augustus (17-37 CE), after being caught with a woman by his disciple, Judas, ‘Leave her alone.’ (Mk: 14. 6) Reported by his disciple, who was also known for stealing money from the collection plate following a sermon by the rabbi, to the Jewish religious police, the Pharisees, Jesus, was nailed to a cross of wood, and died there, but experiencing Resurrection and Ascension to heaven, he was deemed to have broken the curse of death upon Eve’s seed since Eden.

 That Christ’s immortality was due to his being able to see with women’s eyes has so far escaped the attention of the mass media. Before his crucifixion, and a contributing factor to it, as misanthropy was a huge dehumanizing factor in the suppressing of women’s seed, when a woman was accused of adultery, Jesus said, ‘Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.’ (John: 8. 7) As women’s seed is adulterated by men, that is, aliens posing as demons, as Jesus demonstrated, when allowing them, in possession of the body of a man (Mk: 5. 13), to enter a herd of pigs, which promptly ran off a cliff to drown, in the sea of Galilee, women aren’t adultery, whereas men are.

 God’s seed of Eve is perceivable as a paradigm for the combining of atomic valences, as well as molecules, representing the weaker interactions of unstable atomic combining. Hydrogen and oxygen, for example, combine to produce water, which evaporates when heat is applied. Whereas hydrogen (H2) and oxygen (O2) are always that, the testing of the weaknesses of the futa combining, as represented by the figure of Satan, resulted in a paradigmatic falsehood, which negatively influenced physics’ ability to describe the universe. Human molecular structure, artificially reduced to either positive male, or negative female, valences, not only weakens the prevailing scientific paradigm’s descriptors, as the futaverse of cold fusion in potentiam contains all of those nascent human valences needed for the constellating of that appearance of God, but promotes extinction.

 If the Valence that is Holly isn’t hermaphroditic, that doesn’t mean that the human footrace can’t combine with her, while futanarian humanity can combine with each other. In simple terms, women’s seed has all of the wombs, and all of the penis, needed to be a race separate from men. As a form of heat generation, cold perforce, remembered knowledge of how their species combines sexually, is not only a release of energy, but the emergence of a qualitatively different human consciousness for which cold fusion is normative.

 The belief that female valences can’t combine like males prevents the modelling of cheaper sources of energy technologies. Particles, let’s say, party girls, are atoms that are both male and female, rather than that there are male and female atoms, which is a different ‘holy valence’. From the perspective of physics, immortality through science, resulting from the brainpower produced by Eve’s seed to crush the head of those born from the seed of the serpent, is their holy grail.

 The vessel used by Christ at his ‘Last Supper’ with the disciples, before his crucifixion, is symbolic, ‘And he took bread … broke it and gave it to them .., “This is my body, which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.”’ (Luke: 22. 19) After instructing the disciples, including Judas, the betrayer ‘… [Jesus] took a cup, and when he had given thanks he gave it to them, and they all drank of it. And he said to them, “This is my blood ...”’ (Mk: 14. 23-24) In the Christian church, the priest offers to the parishioners ‘holy Communion’, as a thin wafer of bread, and a sip of wine from a goblet, in accordance with Jesus’ promise of an immortal spirit body, after death.

 In France’s Perceval and the Story of the Grail (c. 1182-90) by Chrétien de Troyes, and the 14^th century Welsh Mabinogion of British mythology, as well as England’s Sir Thomas Mallory’s Le Morte D’Arthur (1485), the vessel used by Christ reappears as the grail, which of all of the knights of king Arthur seated at le table ronde, Perceval alone is vouchsafed a glimpse, suggesting his name means ‘the valence that is pierced’, as not only is women’s seed a hidden secret, but women are a farm, representing a greater vision.

 What is missing from the physical world is an explanation of how futa ‘fit in’, strongly, so precluding the necessity of changing the perspective of the explicators. Although black holes could be perceived as female, as they’re vaginal, the homosexually transmitted ‘killer disease’, AIDS, and its SARS concomitant, suggest to the investigative imagination that black holes are homosexual devourers, closely linked to the fact that such men are anal, while the possibility of both male and female black holes is precluded by the single male and/or female paradigm.

 That ‘wormholes’ are perceived as representing a means of instantaneous travel between sections of the universe is an asexual perception, whereas it’s conceivable that such are male, as the urethra carrying semen, or female, like the fallopian tubes, or both male and female, representing both urethra and fallopian tubes; as futa. If a sexual view of God’s creation is being indicated, as basic to a universal paradigm, it encompasses the human at its centre. The existence of black holes, as ostensible devourers of the universe, indicates a problem mirrored in the microcosm as AIDS/SARS; for example. Without a universal understanding of sexuality, in denying futa’s role within an explicatory paradigm, it’s an occult preclusion against the finding of a cure.

 That the United States would rather war on the Moslem nations of Islam, feigning incuriousness over what the women there keep under the black one-piece coveralls of their burkas is symptomatic of a sick explanatory paradigm. Adults are taught that pornography isn’t educational in terms of human biology. However, if it isn’t clear to everybody where everything goes, or could/can go, the basis of the US’ war on Islam isn’t evident, which is that Moslem ‘nuclear’ families have four wives, as the women reproduce with each other. Then the term ‘nuclear war’ becomes more comprehensible, as a means of describing a society of ‘nuclear families’, riddled with AIDS/SARS, because of homosexuality. Revealing what women’s seed, as a species, look like, would undercut the bases for global armed conflict with their race, and the flesh inside the burkas remaining warm, but uncooked, representing cold fission ships yet unbuilt.

 In the TV serial comedy, What I Like About You (2002-2006), Jenny Garth, as the older sister, Val, and Amanda Bynes, as Holly Tyler, are actresses, who’re sexually literate, ‘What’s more important than doing it in front of everyone she loves … and Tina.’3 Although not presented as lesbians on the show, the audience can be invited to imagine otherwise, as Holly and Val aren’t in fact related. In the absence of the breaking of a societal taboo in fact, where incest is forbidden to prevent the family of women’s seed from reproducing, for example, Holly, Val, and Tina, it’s titillating ‘thought crime’ only. In terms that are understandable from George Orwell’s 1984 (1949) dystopic novel, where ‘Freedom is Slavery’ in ‘doublethink’,4 and US’ transvestite ‘TVs’ became transgender (TG) activists for change, the US’ holocaust of gender determination by surgical intervention upon futa is the basis of its heterosexual monogamy + freak show denial of responsibility to women’s seed in Islam and elsewhere.

 Without an understanding of futa, rather than lesbian, interactivity, women’s seed remains inexplicable. As a censored, and consequently unavailable aspect of the model for explicating the universe, it nevertheless underpins the US’ war on Islam. In corresponding to the impossibility of cold fusion, lesbianism, in denying the futa paradigm of both male and female valences, in atomic and molecular combination, where the neutron nucleon is capable of being negative, as well as positive, slows research into a cheaper source of nuclear energy than the Middle Eastern oil the US had waged war for. Put simply, rather than explain futa by using the media as an educative medium for women’s seed to get out their penises to heat up a universe growing progressively ghoulish, the US would rather have the women of Islam be just desserts.

 

1 Barry, Robin and Maurice Gibb ‘Chain Reaction’, Diana Ross, Eaten Alive, RCA, 1985.

2 Jaimes, Juliette, Sezen Aksu, and Steve Welton-Jaimes ‘Kiss Kiss’, Holly Valence, Footprints, London, 2002.

3 Bynes, Amanda as Holly Tyler in ‘I’ve Got A Secret’, Norma Safford Vela, What I Like About You, Season 4, Episode 4 (72/86), The WB, October 7^th, 2005.

4 Orwell, George 1984, Pt I, Ch.1, Harcourt, Brace, & Co., New York, 1949.

Communalism

 Communalism

 

Although ‘communal’ is an adjective used to describe a particular type of community, deriving from the French ‘commune’, from the Latin, communis, ‘things held in common’, communes were administrative units, created at the beginning of the French Revolution in 1789, with extensive autonomous powers to implement national policy. 57% have less than 500 inhabitants, constituting 7.7% of the population, which suggests isolation and distrust of strangers is basic to ‘communalism’, as the main objective of the Revolution (1789-99) was to bloodily remove the aristocracy, who were perceived as uncommon.

 The French aristocracy was excludingly parasitical, in its approach towards the French people, as emphasized in queen Marie Antoinette’s infamous pronouncement. When told Parisiennes were starving, as they hadn’t bread, Marie said, ‘Let them eat cake!’ Communalism is understandable as the killing of those the community don’t like, for example, king Louis XVI, executed in 1793, following his replacing with the First Republic in 1792, while invading people they don’t care about, or who don’t seem to care about them, as Republicans in Paris, on July 14^th, 1789, stormed the Bastille armory, used as a prison for political prisoners, is another way of defining the functionality of the commune, where the French capital’s is 2 million people.

 Existing, as a unit of governance also throughout Europe, for example, in Switzerland, Germany, Italy, Spain, Belgium, Sweden, and the Netherlands, as well as North America, called ‘townships’, and in South America, often rebellious comunas, within neighborhood bario, for example, Columbia’s San Javier #13, within the city of Medellin, yet Russia’s still best known for self-sufficing communes, following upon its October 1917 ‘communist’ Revolution, led by Vladimir ‘Ilyich’ Lenin, to depose the dynastical rule of autocrat, Tsar Nicholas II.

 With Joseph Stalin succeeding Lenin, as General Secretary of the Communist Party  (1924-53), subsequent forced collectivization of the mir, that is, the communes, as an extractor of resources for the state, with 5 million kulak (farmers) executed and/or dispossessed, explicated communism as a source of radicalization; unwanting those that had nurtured it. The future was its ‘dumbing down’, as communals, corresponding to the Russian, and ‘red’ Chinese term, ‘commissars’. A leadership turning formerly self-sufficient kulak into slave labor. In China, ‘collectivization’ occurred after the CCP’s 1950 ‘land reform’, as giant ‘co-operative’ state communes replaced private land ownership by 1958, with the term applied largely as a ‘sop’ to protect its pogrom. As ‘boosted’ communals, no longer obliged to defer, commissariat teleology is slavery.

 That Germany, as Karl Marx’s Das Kapital (1867), ‘from each according to his abilities; to each according to his needs’ was the communist manifesto, is the ‘player’ in Europe, gains support from Kaiser Wilhelm II’s First World War (1914-18) to enslave other nations, and Reichsführer Adolf Hitler’s Second World War (1939-45) to effect the same. Although Germany’s National Socialism (Nazism) was defeated, ‘Stalinist’ Russia, with similar ‘concentration camps’ for the extermination of ‘undesirables’, that is, Jews, Gypsies, intellectuals, and dissidents, suggests French communalism was the ‘gamer’. In short, that’s what communes do. They boost, and then they kill; for sport, or gain.

 While the United States of North America’s ‘Declaration of Independence’, from the British Empire of George III, was on July 4^th, 1776, with the Revolutionary War (1765-83) lasting only a few years less than its French counterpart, the US’ ‘Indian wars’ (1609-1890), against the native population, with its ‘reservations’ similar to European ‘death camps’, and upwards of 60,000,000 buffalo killed to starve the Indians to death, as they were their food resource, would continue; after political control was firmly established in Washington, D.C., in 1800. That the French communes congratulated the US’ revolutionaries, with a gift of the ‘statue of Liberty’, set in 1886 on ‘Liberty island’ in the harbor of east coast city, New York, has its bathos.

 The boosted create ‘compounds’, construed as used communes, with the commissariats determining on ghettoization for a booster no longer needed. As the Nazis isolated the Jews; distrusted as ‘aliens’. The Jews’ progressive eradication resulting from boosts from communes, made low-brow by their own communal leadership; for example, pogroms against ‘Jewish intellectuals’, where it wasn’t essential to be a Jew.

 Only was it necessary to have a perspective different from the single viewpoint of the commune, with its compound eyes of a ‘bug’ collective, ‘In the street of the blind, the one-eyed man is called the guiding light.’1 However, as the blinders convince the blind they don’t want to see, in science fictional terms communes are ‘bug-eyed monsters’ (BEMs), like those of Robert A. Heinlein’s Starship Troopers (1959), ‘To permit irresponsible authority is to sow disaster; to hold a man responsible for anything he does not control is to behave with blind idiocy.’2

 Asian communist despot Pol Pot’s ‘Khmer Rouge’ evacuated Cambodia’s major cities; Phnom Penh, for example, the capital. President Pot’s regime depopulated the country by a third; from 1975 through 1979. The people had been ‘intellectuals’. The nation needed to be returned to the serfdom of a more tractable rural-centred agrarian economy, without anything extraordinary to disturb its communal averaging; like functioning electro-chemical brain synapses, for example.

 In the US ‘compound’ means ‘open space’, where prisoners stretched their legs, outside the confines of their prison cells at the penitentiary, or ‘place of correction’. Though also used to describe where Indians were detained, or black slaves had their quarters, within the cotton plantations of the Southern States secession, and before the Civil war (1861-65) of manumission, prosecuted by the North of the Union.

 Although places like Soweto ‘township’ in South Africa, during the period of apartheid, obtaining to separate white citizens from black, on the grounds of white supremacy, existed as essentially ‘work camps’, the notion is diluted in the US, as ‘reserved’ interchanges with ‘reservation’. The ‘Kennedy compound’, at 50 Marchant Avenue, Hyannis Port waterfront, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, where have lived, since 1928, the extended family of US’ President John F. Kennedy, shot and killed in Dallas, Texas, in 1963, is either an elite preserve; or where the criminals exercise: depending on linguistic perception. The Jackson ‘family’ of pop music ‘brothers and sisters’, living in their ‘Jackson compound’, were similarly a black ‘reservation’; in a system where Indians reservations were the forerunner of slave compounds.

 What communes represent is collective suicide; producing leaderships that kill them: as they don’t measure up to their own ideal. Although the boosted communal can commute its sentence upon the commune, effectively it’s the commune that’s convinced of the desirability of its own death. Invasive war, based on communalism’s dislike of exclusion, denies the possibility of the invaded from escaping their own commune’s self-determining, that is, suicide.

 Russia’s invasion of the Ukraine in 2022, in support of Russian communes there, wasn’t a successful commuting, as the distance between those wanting self-determination, and those who wanted them to be determined, remained unassailable. That the commune is bred to boost itself, and then kill itself, so its slavery can live on what it’s produced, is communalism, and is what people do.

 The communes of the Russian soviet, that is, local government, where ‘local’ could mean Asia’s Kazakhstan, seventh largest country, after Canada, and part of Russia’s Soviet Empire, were ‘godless’, as  soviet communist ideology was humanism, which Judeo-Christian terms is Salvation; through good works. In simple terms, Russians lived in a dream of wish-fulfilment, which is what their churches represented.

 However, as dreams remained unfulfilled, communism’s approach was to lead the workers in their labor, whereas according to Christians they don’t have to work for Salvation, they can loaf, as they’re slavers, ‘… [Martha having ] a sister named Mary, who sat at … [Jesus’] feet listening … [asked] do you not care that my sister has left me to serve alone?”’ (Luke: 10. 40) Jesus replied, “Mary has chosen the good portion, and it will not be taken away from her.” (Luke: 10. 42) Jesus’ disciple Paul wrote, after Jesus’ execution, ‘… you have been saved … not by works ..’. (Eph: 2. 9) However, Jesus’ life was devoted to good works, directly attributable to his Resurrection, after being taken to the hill of Calvary, outside the city of Jerusalem, during the occupation of Palestine by the Roman Empire of Tiberius Augustus (17-37 CE), where ‘Christ’, the Messiah, founder of the New Testament of the Bible, superseding, according to Christianity, the history and law of the Jews, as the Torah and Talmud of the Old Testament, was nailed to a cross of wood, and died there, for teaching that God’s law could be distilled as, ‘Love your neighbour as you love yourself.’ (Mk: 12. 31)

 What isn’t evident to Christians is the reason for the disciple Judas’ betrayal of Jesus to the Jewish religious police; the Pharisees. Finding Jesus alone with a woman, which is compromising in Judaism, Judas, known for stealing from the collection plate, said that the ‘perfume’ was ‘too expensive’ for the Messiah, who demurred mildly, ‘Leave her alone.’ (Mk: 14. 6) She wasn’t Judas’ crowd, who were there to watch Jesus’ crucifixion, while Judas’ role was as a slaver, who wanted to be the ‘screw’ for Jesus and his disciples, as well as pimp the women as whores. Illustrative is the common perception that, if screws replaced the nails in Jesus’ hands and feet, his lesson could be repeated for the next crowd, who’d pay to watch, as that’s what the Resurrection was for.

 Just why the woman wasn’t Judas’ crowd is evident from Eve, the woman created by God in the paradise of Eden, where the angel, Satan, was turned into a serpent by God for giving Eve ‘the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil’, which it was teach to taste, whereas God had told Eve, and the first man created by God, Adam, they should ‘eat only from the fruit of the tree of life’, which is immortality. Expelling them from Eden, God nevertheless promised Eve her ‘seed’ would prevail, ‘You shall crush the head of the serpent with your foot but he will bruise your heel.’ (Gen: 3. 15) According to Judaic midrash, that is, exegesis, Adam was a hermaphrodite, that is, futanarian, also called futa, while Eve, created from the rib or side of Adam by God is a euphemism for birth from self-fertilization; or, in other words, God’s ‘foot’ is brainpower from the human species of women’s seed, which Jesus, born uncontaminated by the seed of the serpent, from his mother, the Virgin Mary, represents.

 Through technology and medical science, that is, brain work, immortality’s re-conferred, rather than through loafing, as the better bred, who’re women’s seed as Jesus’ crowd. The Christian ‘parish’ pre-dated the commune. A church, with the houses of its congregation, were for communing, through the ‘Communion Service’, officiated by the priest there, in accordance Jesus’ ‘Last Supper’ with his disciples, before his execution as a dissident, ‘And he took bread … broke it and gave it to them, saying, “This is my body, which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.”’ (Luke: 22. 19) After instructing the disciples, including Judas, ‘…took a cup, and when he had given thanks he gave it to them, and they all drank of it. And he said to them, “This is my blood ...”’ (Mk: 14. 23-24) During ‘holy Communion’ the priest affords a thin wafer of bread and a sip of wine from a cup to the parishioner, in accordance with Jesus’ promise of an immortal spirit body, after death.

 Often thought of as a prototypical commune is the relationship of Jesus and his disciples, with Judas boosted to the role of communal leader. As a ‘launch pad’ the commune pogroms the led for not being as they want. In not seeing that the woman wasn’t ‘things held in common’, Judas made Jesus a scapegoat for the wrath of the larger commune.

 Pertinent is the Old Testament narrative of the man accused of working on the ‘sabbath’, that is, Saturday in Judaism, which is against the law of God, according to the Talmud, and the man was promptly executed, for collecting firewood, ‘So, as the Lord commanded Moses, all the congregation brought him outside the camp and stoned him with stones, and he died.’ (Num: 15. 36) Ironically, there’s a parallel narrative of a German Protestant, executed for collecting firewood on Sunday, which is the ‘sabbath day’ in Christianity, as representing the six days it took for the creator, God, to create the Earth, before resting on the seventh. God, as the personification of a commune leader, pogroms the collective, perceiving itself as imperfect. Similarly, Jesus, called Logos, or logic of God, the ‘Word’, was killed, perceived as less than perfect by the commune, while the wooden cross upon which he was crucified, resembling a child’s sword, or an airplane, by turns, is a symbol of the communal leadership, boosted, according to Swiss developmental psychologist Carl Jung (1875-1961) by a ‘key to the imagination’ he called ‘archetypal’. For Jung, the unconscious contained many archetypes, facultas praeformandi, triggered into becoming conscious by ‘active imagination’; a requisite for the inventiveness of intelligent thought.

 The crucifix, in shape resembling a sword, plunged into the ground, and the cruciform shape of the airplane, corresponds to the passage in the Old Testament, about peace in the future, ‘They will beat their swords into plowshares …’ (Is: 2. 4) For the evil, airplanes aren’t a means of transporting passengers, but ploughing people under by bombing them, ‘Mystery, Babylon, mother of harlots, and of the abominations of the Earth.’ (Rev: 17. 5) Jesus’ disciple John’s Revelation was his apocalyptic vision of the future, where A-bombing nations was the result of the fate of Jesus’ triggering an archetype of the imagination for the development of the airplane. Dropped, on the nation of Japan, Germany’s ally, by the B-29 superfortress aircraft, Enola Gay, on August 6^th, 1944, over the city of Hiroshima, by the US, to effectively close out WWII in the Pacific theatre, was another ‘communal’ decision, having as its basis the belief that the need for greater human sacrifices as animals on the altar of God was what Jesus’ crucifixion illustrated as being desirable.

 When the US invaded Iraq in March 2003 to depose Iraqi dictator, Saddam Hussein, accused of planning to develop ‘weapons of mass destruction’, his palace, north of the city of Al-Hillah, 100km south of capital, Baghdad, was close to the site of the founding of the city of Babylon (c. 4000 BCE), symbol of peoples being ploughed under, after the fashion of the Pharaohs of ancient Egypt, who’d have thousands of people killed, and entombed with them, when they died, so that they would have slaves in the afterlife.

 In northern Iraq, Hussein’s troops bulldozed 5,000 Kurd villages (180,000 people), during the 1988 ‘Anfal [looting] campaign’, as that’s what those who’re bred are for to communal leaders; feed. Sura 8, Al-Anfal, in the Koran (610-30 CE), dictated by the angels to the Moslems’ Prophet Mohamed, according to Islamic tradition, means ‘Spoils of War’. In the 1990-91 war to liberate Kuwait from invasion by Iraq, as well as obtain the spoils of Middle Eastern oil, US’ 1^st Infantry Division used ‘combat plows and bulldozers’ to bury Iraqi troops in miles of trenches, while in 2003 2 ton ‘bunker buster’ Guided Bomb Units (type -28, and - 37), dropped from B2 ‘stealth’ bombers, entombed Iraqi Republican Guard regiments. Reports had all the hallmarks of it being a tomb war.

 The problem with killing to make slaves for Pharaoh is, if the killed aren’t volunteers, the resurrected aren’t likely to be friendly, and many Islamic leaders arrived at their eminent position, through assassination, of previous incumbents in the role, who had more legitimacy as rulers. The removing of Middle Eastern dictatorships; Saddam Hussein in Iraq, Colonel Gadhafi in Africa’s Libya, and Bashar Assad in Syria, likely occurred as slaves are enemies of their slaver.

 While tomb raiders are looters, it’s what God’s ‘choosing people’ are for. Lining their coffin boxes with treasure. Valuable objects d’art, and expensive media communications systems; for example, and a hearse in the adjacent box for the carriage. In modern parlance, the garage of the car that goes with the house, as slaver loot, is for robbers who want content for themselves, and don’t want the contented to escape being hearsed (cursed) by them.

 The solution is, housed in their own starship, to leave the coffin boxing to the vampires. The product of the brainpower of women’s seed, the hermaphroditic ‘foot’ of God, with all of its futa semen, and all of the human host’s wombs, is for the colonization of the planets, amongst the stars. With the parasite, wanting to live off their blood, continuing to spout its propaganda, left behind, ‘For we brought nothing into the world, so we cannot carry anything out of it.’ (1 Tim: 6. 7) The content, warred against by balloons, without substance; blood-drinking bloats. The content, from their houses, leaving. Starships and rejuvenation technologies conferring immortality, condemning vampirism; the thieving killer: advocate of infanticide for heirs and euthanasia for the decedent.

 An Iraqi colonel, with Al-Amn al-‘Amm, Saddam Hussein’s ‘force for policing political activity’ (1982-99), said ‘We would take people to the police station and give them a drink laced with sodium fluoroacetate or thallium, poisons for killing rats. Then we would let them go. Later, they would die and no one knew it was us.’2 Coffin box looters, where the housed are hearsed by the cars (curse) of the vampire that wants its drink, rather than see those they leech off reach the planets amongst the stars, is what communalism is.

 From the perspective of the commune, it’s normal. Eve was given the fruit by Satan for the same reason. Well-bred ephemerals can’t escape from being looted by stronger individuals. Boosted, Satan represents the communal, as leader of the fallen commune of God’s angels. A killer, whose specific purpose is to ensure the weakened slave can’t get out of their coffin box housing, with Satan finally nailing the lids shut, as Jesus’ should have been; to prevent his leaving. Then the commune can kill and loot with Satan, the communal leader, elderly peaceful communes bred for consumers to consume without cost.

 God chose the Jews to be different. The Germans stole from them by labelling them ‘aliens’: the holocaust nothing. That communism was Stalinist ‘death camps’, as Nazi socialism was, isn’t a sign of similar approaches by differing political ideologies, but of boosting communes to produce communal leaders, who kill what isn’t low; to loot. France, the UK, the US, and Russia, are A-bombing nations, because they’re larger communes, while lesser abominations, smaller cannibal communes, also loot, by boosting local communal leaders to kill the better bred of their communities; for food, cash, property, and goods.

 That Christian congregations are called ‘flocks’, with Jesus Christ as their ‘shepherd’, affords no hope to the historical pattern of the better bred being prey to wolves wanting more cheapish plunder. God told Abraham, while telling him that he needn’t slay with his knife, son Isaac, founder of the commune, Judaism, atop a mountain, on an altar he’d built there, for the human sacrifice God had ordered, ‘In blessing I will bless you and in multiplying I will multiply your descendants like the stars of the heavens and like the sand on the seashore.’ (Gen: 22. 17) A bigger kill and more loot.

 

1 Freedman, H., and Maurice Simon Midrash Rabbah: Genesis (300-500 CE), I, Noach, 30. 9, London, Soncino, 1983.

2 Heinlein, Robert A. Starship Troopers, G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1959, Ch.12.

2 Boggan, Steve, The Evening Standard, London, April 17^th, 2003, p. 6

Witches Write In Neck Shells

 Witches Write In Neck Shells

 

An ancient piece of folklore is, ‘Witches ride in egg shells.’1 That might be linked to ancient saurian ancestors and the association of eggs with the Resurrection and Ascension to heaven of Jesus ‘Christ’, the Messiah, whose teaching as a Jewish rabbi, during the period of the Empire of Rome’s occupation of Palestine, in the reign of Tiberius Augustus (17-37 CE), led to his being nailed to a cross of wood atop the hill of Calvary outside the city of Jerusalem, where he died.

 The counterpart of man in the Old Testament of the Bible, which is the history and law of the Jews, that is, their Torah and Talmud, is the angel, Satan, turned into a serpent by God for persuading the first woman, Eve, to ‘eat of the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil’, which it was death to taste, disobeying the creator God’s injunction to ‘eat only of the fruit of the tree of life’, which was immortality.

 There’s more than a suggestion that reptilian eggs and mammalian ova are somehow reconciled in the celebration of Jesus’ rising from the dead, coinciding with the beginnings of spring, in the Easter festival of Christianity, which is the religion founded by Jesus’ disciples after his Ascension to heaven, according to the four corroborative accounts of his life’s story, composed by the disciples, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, comprising what Christians know as the New Testament of the Bible, which they believe supersedes the Old Testament, with Jesus’ teaching distilling the entirety of Talmudic law as, ‘Love your neighbour as you love yourself.’ (Mk: 12. 31)

 God’s expelling of Eve, and the first man created by God, Adam, from their original home in the paradise of Eden, is presented as a punishment for bringing upon themselves the curse of death, although God promises Eve that her ‘seed’ will prevail, ‘You shall crush the head of the serpent with your foot, but he will bruise your heel.’ (Gen: 3. 15) According to Jewish midrash, that is, exegesis, Adam was a hermaphrodite, called ‘futanarian’, or futa, that is, God’s ‘foot’, while Eve, born from the side/rib of Adam, is euphemistically understandable as self-birth following self-fertilization of an ovum.

 That there is then a distinction between the seed of Eve, as mammalian ova, and the serpent’s seed of Satan, which is the eggs of reptilians, is a basis for perceiving what is construable as an ancient conflict between egg-laying and egg-hatching saurians, and womb-birthing mammalians, reconciled in the Christian practice of decorating and consuming eggs at Easter in celebration of Jesus’ victory over death, which is perceived as the breaking of the curse and the re-conferring of immortality upon human nature.

 That people die, which belies the belief in Jesus’ overcoming death, requires a further understanding of what the seed of Eve represent, that is, the brainpower needed to develop the medical technology necessary to overcome death, and so make immortality a permanent feature of human existence. Christianity seems rather to hold to the belief that death is a consequence of being the seed of the serpent, that is, Jesus was human, whereas those who die are extinct like the dinosaurs, whether they accept the teaching of Jesus or no, emphasized by the consuming of their eggs at Easter as chocolate taunts.

 Although most people think of the egg, at Easter, as symbolizing the birth of the infant Jesus, at Christmas, come to fulfilment at Easter, the ‘egg and spoon race’,2 familiar to children at school fêtes, for example, likely signifies the victory of the mammalian over the saurian, as spoons and cups are how eggs are eaten at human family breakfasts. That God’s first creation of winged saurians is what Judeo-Christianity dignifies with the title ‘angels’ also seems plausible, although as ornithology points out birds are the descendants of reptiles, which leaves room for the argument that angels were bird-like, rather than of the leathery aspect of the pterodactyl, or the mythic mien of the dragon. That witches ride in eggshells probably refers to their perceivedly non-human identity. Being born with a third teat, for example, an attribute for the succour of familiars, corresponding to homunculi, or other demon deemed of use to the practitioner of witchcraft; not excluding animals: or indeed aliens.

 That Satan intended for Eve and Adam to be the progenitors of a non-human race is evident from the Judaic belief in Lilith. This ‘first woman created by God’ refused to lie beneath Adam in subjugation, and went on to breed a race of demons with the angel, Samäel, that is, Lilith was the forerunner of witches who rode in eggshells, as their ‘mother’, while Satan’s interference in the development of Eve and Adam’s future amounts to plagiarism, that is, witches write in neck shells, as the skulls of the non-human contain nothing human, and so are effectively empty shells, which accords with the Jews’ belief in Sheol, corresponding to the hell of Christianity, and where people, as shells containing what isn’t human any longer, haven’t any hope of Resurrection and Ascension to heaven, but might make an interesting tale.

 That the tale is Satan’s evolving tail of a saurian ancestral lineage is what the decorating and eating of boiled eggs at Easter symbolizes, as humans aren’t shells, according to Christian belief, as they have immortal spirit bodies. These transcend death, and continue in an afterlife approximating to what Judeo-Christianity, and other religions, define as the heavenly realm, which the serpent’s seed of Satan are barred from entering, as they’re what science fiction writers describe as ‘meat bots’; robotic flesh, devoid of volitional spirit, impelled by directive: as slaves.

 In previous centuries the Popes of Catholicism, deriving their authority from the disciple, Peter, who became the first amongst Christians in Rome, sold indulgences to rich businessmen, or aristocrats and members of the clergy, etc., who sought absolution, that is, forgiveness of sins, to afford them egress to the heavenly Empyrean after death. However, absolution doesn’t guarantee a spirit body to a neck shell. For modern Christianity the only chance is to ‘convert’ and receive an immortal spirit body. In the concomitant material transformation, aligned with Jesus’ teaching, the Holy Spirit, as transforming principle, was to be sent by God to Earth, according to the Messiah, subsequent to Jesus’ Ascension.

 Another witches’ tradition is, ‘the hollow’, where witches practice their magic, and disputes are reconciled. Corresponding to familiars, the ‘hood of witchcraft constitutes the womanhood, and manhood, of the ‘craft exponent, writing with the neck shells of her serpent’s seed. The futa aspect of women’s seed is represented by the broomstick, between the legs of the wiccan, as the penis of the hermaphrodite, with the bush of the brush behind to indicate the mons veneris. Often described as ‘toothless’ and ‘hags’,3 for example, the three witches in 17^th century English dramatist William Shakespeare’s Macbeth (1606), teeth have significance as places hollowed out by decay, saved by modern dentisty, but legendarily possessed by vampires sucking out human blood, as a means of making themselves immortal.

 These leeches are the rivals of the witches for the neck shells of the serpent’s seed, whereas women have no rivals for women’s seed, which has given rise to the distinction between white witches, who’re women, either putatively or factually, and black witches, whose art is blackened as its vampired, where the hollowing of teeth is the blood drinkers’ connection to the heart and vitals, though a dam may Satanically benefit from communion with the reputedly immortal parasite to the peril of her future, as God’s punishment upon the evil is eternal unendurable pain for the immortal spirit body; should its flesh ever die.

 

1 Cf. Scot, Reginald Discoverie of Witchcraft, 1584.

2 Oxford English Dictionary V: Dvandva-Follis, Oxford University Press, 1989, p. 92.

3 Shakespeare, William Macbeth, Act IV, Scene i, 1606.

Amp Ear Rock

 Amp Ear Rock

 

Militarized retailing is real. Companies with guards, and staff as auxiliaries, where the custom is slaving to serve the automaton, with a barcode on the receipt for goods purchased; a prerequisite to have scanned by the automata: or the custom won’t be able to leave the prison, ‘And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.’ (Rev: 13. 7) As foretold by Jesus’ disciple, John, in the apocalyptic vision of the future vouchsafed by God’s angels, Revelation, from the New Testament of the Bible, which superseded the Jews’ Torah and Talmud, that is, the history and law of the Old Testament, according to Christians, who believe in the teaching of the Jewish rabbi, Jesus ‘Christ’, their Messiah, ‘Love your neighbour as you love yourself.’ (Mk: 12. 31) The regimentation of social structures belies Jesus’ exhortation, which was his distillation, into a more readily understandable substance, of the content of Judaic law.

 The military ideal is similar to H.G. Wells’ science fiction novel, The Time Machine (1895), in which the Eloi of 802, 701 CE, who’d long ago survived a nuclear holocaust, ‘step lively’ to the nearest metro stations, when they hear ‘air raid’ warnings, and go underground there, where they’re captured and eaten by the subterranean cannibal Morlocks,1 who’ve learned to use the sirens to summon the surface dwellers as food.

 In simple terms people don’t know what their names, numbers, and passwords, etc., actually do, when active in the labyrinthine entrails after what passes through its cerebrum’s synapses in ‘the beast’ of the automated system. Practitioners of NLP, that is, neurolinguistic programing, argue that they can make people do anything, for example, tell a woman to take off her bra, without taking off her sweater, and she instantly can, while the same ‘stage show Johnny’ tells a newly-wed he’ll never have sex with his wife; to the uproarious enthusiasm of the specially invited audience. That militarized custom can become in-service slavery is a modern feature of retail, where the point of the tail of the devil is unclear; but it’s evidently been reattached.

 The siren metaphor appears also in the return of Odysseus from the Greeks’ relatively successful siege of the city of Troy, believed to have been situated in modern Turkey, with the Greek poet Homer’s 8^th century Odyssey most celebratedly linked with the mythic fate of the hero. Odysseus has himself bound to the ship’s mast, so that he can listen to the song of the sirens,2 beautiful mermaids, whose song is believed to lure sailors into the water, where they then drown. Programed to service the till is where the custom is to listen to the sirens, without being bound to the mast of the ship, for example, SPAR, AUCHAN, ASDA, etc., which is a situation fraught with hidden security issues kept far from the apparent automatons supplying the money.

  To custom program the retailer has to reach the ears, which is an issue regularly explored in pop music videos; for example, Britney Spears’ ‘Hold It Against Me’ (2011), where the director has the performer run the gamut of Jungian imagery associated with eyes, ears, nose, and mouth, replete with microphones, and television screens, featuring the star’s earliest recordings of songs advertised as miniature films in the shape of promotional music videos.

 Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961) was the Swiss psychologist who elaborated the theory that there were four functions associated with human consciousness; the ‘Sensation’ function was associated with the eyes; the ‘Thinking’ function was associated with the ears; ‘Intuition’ with the nose, or sense of smell, and ‘Feeling’ with the mouth, which was duplex in that it took in oxygen and other sustenance, while also being associated with speech. This aided Jung’s argument that the use of the four functions resulted from the differentiation of the four senses, as animals don’t talk.

 That propaganda in the form of brainwashing an audience to have them accept what is unacceptable has been an issue ever since National Socialist Germany’s slave labor extermination camps of World War II (1939-49) in which 6,000,000 Jews were first sent to the ‘showers’, where they were killed with the poison gas Zyklon B, before being burned in ovens specifically constructed for that purpose.

 The British Broadcasting Corporation’s (BBC’s) production of the television comedy series ostensibly for adults, but effectively aimed at teenagers, and/or undergraduates, as well as ‘yuppies’, that is, the young and upwardly mobile, in socio-economic terms, The Young Ones (1982-84), featured ‘blipverts’ which, although spoof, could only be viewed relaxedly in slow motion, while the nanoseconds they were on screen were designed to leave an impression that would be impactful enough to make it a custom program of some service to retail.

 Actor Adrian Edmondson, as Vyvyan Basterd, and a writer of the show, along with fellow actor, Rik Mayall, as Rick, comedian Ben Elton, and Lise Mayer, summarized the issue in the episode, ‘Sick’ (1984), with a tirade about the BBC’s The Good Life ‘sitcom’, ‘’It's so bloody nice! Felicity 'Treacle' Kendal and Richard 'Sugar-Flavoured Snot' Briers! What do they do now?! Chocolate-bloody-button ads, that's what! They're nothing but a couple of reactionary stereotypes, confirming the myth that everyone in Britain is a lovable middle-class eccentric. And I! Hate! Them!’’3 The point being that re-runs of the situation comedy are being used as a chocolate buttons ‘ad’, which reductionism is the custom of the retailer.

 That the undeniable sexual desirability of actress Felicity Kendall on the show is reduced to the attractiveness of a chocolate button is an aspect of the general dehumanization, making of people mere numbers, in button-counting exercises, that’s retail. Though the custom is to laugh, the custom won’t be laughing if they understood that militarized companies seek to program their ears to obey automatically like soldiers the orders that they receive in their audial circuitry; either technological or biological: or a mixture.

 Most laymen have heard of AWACS (airborne warning and control system), the airborne early warning system mounted in airplanes with curious mushroom-style domes, stuffed with advanced radar and sonar, not to mention STEALTH, conferring invisibility, but far less are aware of underground slang for Wacks in the ear, for example, amongst the Liverpudlians of Merseyside, gangster banter has a dark meaning, ‘Ter ar wack.’ Meaning ‘goodbye’, in the United States of America, ‘wack’ means to kill (terror wack), and is used by gangsters to speak of the elimination of a ‘business’ rival. Consequently, ear wax (AWACS) is a multiplex gangland reference to the role of wacks and the ears.

 Amongst the Moslems of the nations of Islam, founded by the Prophet Mohamed, after the angels of God dictated the Koran (610-30 CE) to him, the legend is of Iblis, ‘the whisperer’, who has no other power, and is a Shaitan djinn, the equivalent of Satan, in the Bible, turned into a serpent by God, for tempting Eve to ‘eat of the fruit of the knowledge of good and evil’, which it was death to taste. For gangsters Iblis is a type of their ‘ear police’ (Iblis), that is, ear wacks, who kill on the strength the orders they receive, often subsequent to what they communicate to their command system, from what they hear, which is why they’re the wacks of the years in Liverpool.

 Although leeches are familiar to the medical fraternity, as an ancient form of cleaning wounds, by applying the blood-suckers to the affected area, and removing them, or waiting until the bloated creature drops off, satiated, that’s what vampires are traditionally also known for. Usually the parasite is depicted as sinking its fangs into the jugular, as in the movie, Nosferatu (1922), for example, ‘At night, Nosferatu sinketh his fangs into his victim and feedeth on his blood - his hellish elixir of life.’4 Although Egyptology suggests that the Pharaohs of ancient Egypt used ear vampires in their quest for immortality, as death was the curse placed upon Eve and Adam, the first man created by God, for disobeying the injunction to ‘eat only of the fruit of the tree of life’, which is immortality.

 What’s noticeable about Pharaonic representations is the elaborate headdress, nemes, blue and white, or gold, which covers most of the sides of the head, where the ears are hidden, and descends to a region approximately corresponding to the pits of the arms, which suggests that the ears and armpits were a rich source for blood that the vampire needed; probably an earwig. That the creature functioned as a cleaner is plausible, although it’s unlikely that the activity of such would have any medicinal relevance as a purifying system conferring longevity.

 Jesus’ fate is usually cited as the breaking of the curse of death, as he was taken to the hill of Calvary, outside the city of Jerusalem, during the occupation of Palestine by the Empire of Rome, during the reign of Tiberius Augustus (17-37 CE), and nailed to a cross of wood, he died, but experienced Resurrection and Ascension to heaven. Called God’s ‘foot’, Jesus is the fulfilment of a promise made to Eve that her ‘seed’ would prevail, ‘You shall crush the head of the serpent with your foot, but he will bruise your heel.’ (Gen: 3. 15) According to Jewish midrash, that is, exegesis, Adam was a hermaphrodite, while Eve was created by God from Adam’s side, or rib; a euphemism for self-birth after self-fertilization, which is what the futanarian species of women’s seed, that is, futa, or ‘foot’, were for. God’s promise of immortality is dependent on the ability of her seed to produce the brainpower necessary to develop the medical technology to re-confer immortality upon humankind.

 The point is emphasized in Jesus’ disciple Judas’ betrayal of the Messiah who he finds with a woman. Telling Jesus that the ‘perfume’, spikenard, is ‘too expensive’ for Jesus, and should be sold to raise money for the disciples, is what pimps do. Jesus’ mild rebuke was, ‘Leave her alone.’ (Mk: 14. 6) Judas’ response was to call the Jewish religious police to arrest Jesus, and he was condemned to execution by the Roman judge, Pontius Pilate, because of Judas’ spy canard that the woman should have been his to pimp; if she wasn’t already.

 Leaving aside the testicle snorting aspect of nose for our two (nostrils), it’s South Korea to look at for an update on ear vamps, with the all-girl rock band, Blackpink, devoting almost all of the promotional video for the track ‘Jump’ (2025) to ‘earwigging’, which is a term for those who overhear what they aren’t meant to, while ‘wigging out’ is an English term for upbraiding someone so severely that they threaten insanity, or simply a description of someone who is behaving insanely, often because they are. Rosé, Lisa, Jisoo, and Jennie’s take on it is that people ‘wig out’ because of what they’re made to hear, that is, as a consequence of listening to the band’s music:

 

‘Are you not entertained?

I ain't gotta explain

I'm with all of my sisters

Got 'em goin' insane, yeah

You know we on a mission

All gas, no brakes, yeah

Breakin' out of the system

Breakin' out of this cage, yeah …’5

 

 First Blackpink are seen on the tongues, and between the teeth, of four different mouths; perhaps theirs. Then they appear to be in a space where the back of someone’s head should be, before there’s a scene of Lisa inside a head that’s split down the middle, with her back to the inside of the head, and her feet against the other side maintaining the distance between the two halves. The band are then seen inside an ear, while the street audience of ‘headbanged’, who apparently all have them, try to loose Blackpink.

 The girls inside the ear develop pink laser beams, and the street audience have the beams coming out of the corresponding ear. The laser beams confer super powers, and while the sirens of Blackpink appear unscathed, the street audience, who’ve been banging their heads against walls and pavement, etc., lose control completely, and are seen rolling haplessly without volition along the street, like desert tumbleweed, while the girls use their ‘superpowers’ to fly up to a heart-shaped platform amongst the skyscrapers to finish their performance.

 It’s a description of what populations would experience, if their custom slave programs, used by business companies, were utilized by units of military intelligence to subliminally auto-suggest behavior to adopt in the event of an intervention. As North Korea sabre-rattled its continuing argument with the United States, harking back to the war waged against communism in the Korean peninsula (1950-53), resulting in the separation of North from South, Blackpink’s ‘Jump’ was construable as a warning of what to expect in a future war of drones, NLP, and unsolicited neurological implantations amongst an audience unplanning to be involved with Molochs.

 As a Moloch, or Moloch as the actual name of a particular god (Lev: 18. 21), was invariably associated with child-sacrifice, which largely occurred because the aged hate the newborn, as reminding them of the short time they have left, it’s logical to conjecture that ‘Jump’ in some way has relations with Moloch, where the young generation of innovative Koreans, yet at the mercy of US’ military ambition’s ‘Old Glory’, informatively dissemble their desperation; at the forefront of testiness in the aftermath of the Russian Federation’s unanticipated futuristic ‘drone war’ try-out with the Ukraine.

 'Banging' is of course a euphemism for human sexual intercourse, which suggests a correlation between heads and banging; head fucking. Although it’s difficult to imagine, the hole in the back of the head, where the Blackpink quartet appear to be standing at the outset of ‘Jump’, suggests the tool used by head fuckers, inserted into the back of the head, to make a hole, into which the penis is inserted.

 According to Jungian psychology, the soul-image of an individual, called the anima, is recognizable in the externality in the shape of real women, as the internal anima-figure draws the looker-on to the object of sexual desire. Roughly approximating to what film-makers think of as animating, Blackpink correspond to anima-figures much sought after by head fuckers, while the headbanging scenes of the audience in the video correspond, in psychoanalytical terms, to their desire to get these ‘babes’ out of their heads in an externalization resembling sacrifice to Moloch.

 

1 Wells, H.G. The Time Machine, 'Paradise', William Heinemann, 1895, Ch.5, op cit.

2 Homer, The Odyssey, Bk XII, 8^th century.

3 Edmondson, Adrian 'Ade' as Vyvyan Basterd in The Young Ones, Episode 5, Series 2, ‘Sick’, June 12^th, 1984, BBC2, November 9^th, 1982 - June 19^th, 1984.

4 Silent era of film ‘Intertitle’ for Nosferatu: A Symphony of Horror, Prana Film, 1922.

5 Diplo, Jesse Bluu, Jumpa, Malachiii, Teddy, 24, Claudia Valentina, and Zikai, ‘Jump’, Blᴧɔkpiиk, The Black Label, 2025.

The Beast’s Ridden by a Whore because She’s Pleased

The Beast’s Ridden by a Whore because She’s Pleased

 

The ‘second beast’ of the prophetic book of Revelation in the New Testament of the Bible by John, the disciple of the Jewish rabbi, Jesus, is described as a ‘wonder’, because of a wounded head that renewed itself. If read symbolically, that would suggest a state apparatus of a global nature. A security organ, like the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in the United States of America, or Soviet Russia’s Committee for State Security, with its KGB acronym, based on the Cyrillic alphabet, artificially created towards the end of the 9th century, by the Christian followers of Cyril, ‘Apostle to the Slavs’, at the Preslav Literary School, Pliska, capital of the first Bulgarian Empire (681-1018 C.E.), and first used there, as a means of brain control, as all languages ultimately are.

 Although socialist, and scientific romanticist, George Orwell, presented the fictional thesis, Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949), as hypothetical, in fact the dictatorial character, ‘Big Brother’, was the pleased ‘beast’, that is, language was the thought policed, as ‘the beast’ dictated what was thinkable, ‘If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever.’1 Orwell’s concepts of ‘thought police’, ‘thoughtcrime’, and ‘double-think’, amongst the people of Ingsoc (English Socialism), with Britain now ‘Airstrip One’, a province of Oceania, opposed to Eurasia/Eastasia, had very real counterparts, in terms of the ideologies of Communism, which was the weltanschauung of ‘sharing’, adopted by Russia, after the First World War (1914-18), as disseminated in German economist Karl Marx’s Das Kapital (1867), and Christianity; a world view espousing sacrifice for the common good.

 At first examination, Christianity bears a strong resemblance to the communist system, where ‘soviet’ is the term used for collective responsibility. After the Second World War (1939-45), countries that came under the control of Russia, subsequent to the second defeat of Germany’s ambitions as a global slaver, became member states of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR).

 As with Jesus’ teaching, in accordance with the Gospels, as the four corroborative narratives of his disciples, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, which became the New Testament of the Bible, that is, the Jews’ Torah and Talmud, which is their law and history, known by Christians as the superseded Old Testament, communism advocated sharing ‘bread and wine’ in common.

 The basic tenet of Christianity is ‘Communion’, following Jesus’ ritualization of a meal, before his execution, ‘And he took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and gave it to them, saying, “This is my body, which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” (Luke: 22. 19) Communism is actually derived from Communion, ‘And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he gave it to them, and they all drank of it. And he said to them, “This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many.‘ (Mk: 14. 23-24)

 The covenant of God, the creator, was with Eve, who in Eden was told, according to the Old Testament, ‘You shall crush the head of the serpent with your foot, but he will bruise your heel.’ (Gen: 3.15) The promise comes, after Eve is tricked by the angel, Satan, into accepting the ‘fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil’, which it is death to taste, in disobedience to God’s injunction that Eve, the woman, and the first man created by God, Adam, created as a hermaphrodite, before the self-birthing of Eve, according to the midrash of Judaism, eat only of ‘the fruit of the tree of life’, which is immortality.

 Turning Satan into a serpent, God says, “I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her seed.” (Gen: 3. 15) That women are ‘futa’ suggests they’re the ‘foot’ of God, ‘So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.’ (Gen: 1. 27) Eve’s hermaphroditic ‘seed’ is to replace the crushed head of Satan’s seed, corresponding to the renewing head of the beast of slavery in the Revelation of Jesus’ disciple, John.

 That Jesus’ injunction to his disciples resembles that of a vampire coven is used by Satanists. Christianity, with its shepherd and sheep metaphor for Jesus and the church, is presented as literal truth. As a futanarian race, women’s seed are depicted by Satanism as the bred of heaven, consumed by the serpent’s seed, which is the fate of brainpower. In simple terms, for Satanism, art, science, civilization and culture are for putz. The objective is to breed slaves, eat them, and drink their blood, which is ‘Paradise enow’2 to parasites.

 The Satanist argument is that the reason Jesus is a shepherd is that he works for the butcher. For Satanism, Judas is the key figure. When Jesus is being anointed with the oil, spikenard, by a woman, Judas’ spy canard is that the perfume is ‘too expensive’. Jesus says, ‘Leave her alone.’ (Mk: 14. 5) Judas’ response, the archetypal pimp, who hasn’t given his permission, is to betray Jesus, accused of working on the Jewish day of rest, that is, healing, on Saturday, to the Jewish religious police, the Pharisees, as it’s punishable by death, according to Jewish practice; the precedent being a man executed for collecting wood ‘on the sabbath’ (Num: 15. 35). The Satanist perspective is that Jesus was seeing a woman, whereas Judas was a man, that is, as a homosexual slaver, he had Satanism’s defining male quality; disinterest in women, except as meat and drink in vampirism, ‘”The one I kiss, he’s the one; arrest him!” So he went right up to Jesus and said, “Greetings, rabbi!” and kissed him.’ (Matt: 26. 48) Jesus, close to the truth that women breed with each other, was killed to prevent it becoming known, ‘The second beast was given power to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that the image could speak and cause all who refused to worship the image to be killed.’ (Rev: 13. 5) Television is the medium used to promote the butcher to the meat. For homosexual slavers, human women are the bred entwined with heaven, which is the Satanical explanation for Jesus’ Resurrection and Ascension. Shepherds breed their food.

 In Orwellian terms, Christianity is ‘double-think’, as the flock shouldn’t know that they’re meat and blood for vampires, while ‘political correctness’ is that polite deference which the beast feels is owing to it for its thoughtful policing of the whore, so that the livestock don’t become alarmed at being money and property for the meta-fictional continent of euthanasia, ‘Mystery, Babylon the great, mother of harlots and of the abominations of the Earth.’ (Rev: 17. 5)  The whore is pleased, which is why she’s depicted as riding the beast of Revelation, because the beast is policing to her. From a Satanist point of view, any secular, or religious, ideology, is the sign of a policed whore, which is what ‘good breeding’ is for. Persuading the human to reject the ‘thoughtcrime’ of refusal, and accept its sacrifice as a common good; irrespective of its communal affiliations.

 

1 Orwell, George Nineteen Eighty-Four, III, Secker & Warburg, Ch. 3, 1949.

2 Khayyám, Omar (transl. Edward FitzGerald) Rubáiyát, Quatrain XI, 1859.