Coprophile Criticism
Literary criticism is usually thought of as being either an
analysis of the author’s mind based on the text, or of the text independent of
the author’s intention. Consequently, Jungian literary criticism, which is
based on an analysis of the educational intent of the author is a dominant
form. According to the developmental psychologist, Carl Gustav Jung
(1875-1961), literary products are an expression of what he called ‘the Self’,
which was conscious and/or unconscious to a lesser or greater degree. The work
could be analyzed critically to determine to what extent the author intended to
write what was written, and also what the author was unconsciously revealing
about his/her nature and/or human nature through the text.
Criticism that didn’t
consider the author or text as anything other than a convenience for their
opinions about civilization, culture, and art, were identifiably coprophile,
that is, the work of the author was an excretion, which was what the author was.
This approach to literature derived from Jung’s predecessor, Sigmund Freud
(1856-1939), who described all civilization, culture and art as ‘nothing but’ the excretions of the sexually repressed
human mind. For Freud the unconscious was the repressed ‘id’, which essentially
was a convenience from whence humans excreted, whereas Jung’s perception of the
unconscious ‘Self’ was of a consciousness in the process of becoming. Jung
posited a collective human unconscious containing what he called ‘archetypes’
existing as a facultas praeformandi,
that is, a pre-existent capacity to adapt. Jungian psychology identified many
archetypes, for example, the hero, which was associated with the ego, and the anima corresponding to various aspects
of the feminine and/or female, that is, mother, daughter, sister, wife, etc. Jungian
literary analysis used archetypal knowledge to interpret text and mind of the
author in order to understand what was being expressed and/or activated within
the mind of the reader, so providing an analytical framework for determining a
work’s positive or negative effect.
Although humans
constitute a pool of knowledge, which can be accessed, for the coprophile
humans should be a cess pool. Analysts are associated with the concept, ‘anal’,
because they’re prepared to examine the products of human consciousness after
Freud’s defining it as ‘nothing but’ excretive. Coprophiles, however, believe
Freud, that is, all human activity is excrescence, that is, ‘shit’. In literary
terms, this results in a determinist approach towards criticism that is coprophile.
The author and the work are interpreted by as being of the degree of
worthlessness that the mind of the coprophile can ascribe to it. Consequently,
much of supposed literary analysis is thinly disguised coprophilia, because the
critic is in love with their own shit and so reject the text as not being the
convenience they want in order to express their self-love. The result is that
society’s development can be measured by reference to the extent to which
coprophile analysis prevails, that is, demonstrable ignorance of the text on
the part of the critic.
A sociologically pertinent instance is ISIS, the Independent
State of Iraq and Syria, whose flag, ‘There is no God but God’, features a bone
white moon. Isis was the sun goddess of ancient Egypt, which religion was
superseded by Islam. Although the
Prophet Mohamed’s Koran (610-30 C.E.),
which was supposedly gifted by the angels of God, forms the basis of Islamic
belief, Islam is perceived by Judeo-Christianity as illegitimate, because
Mohamed was of the line of Ishmael, who was the second son of Abraham, the father
of Isaac, who founded Judeo-Christianity. When Sara, his wife, became barren,
she gave Abraham her maid, Hajer, who bore Ishmael. Judeo-Christianity
perceives Islam as illegitimate because Hajer was unwed. Consequently, a
preoccupation with Islamicists is legitimacy. The Moslem peoples’ permitting themselves four wives is a retroactive
attempt to legitimize Ishmael’s birth
from a woman unwed by making polygamy de rigeur. Moreover, according to Jung, there are four functions of
consciousness, that is, ‘Sensation, Thinking, Feeling and Intuition’. Coming to
consciousness is a process of developing the functions, so the four wife
marriage of the Moslem peoples is a developmental archetype. The earlier model
is demonstrated in the ancient Egyptian myth of the sun god, Ra, who incarnates
upon the Earth as Osiris, who is dismembered by his evil brother, the god Set,
before Isis, the sun goddess, recovers the pieces of Osiris’ dismembered body
and restores him. The four-part myth
describes the process of what Jung called ‘individuation’, that is, individual
development or growth through experience of the world.
The Independent State
of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) is symptomatic of coprophile analysis, that is,
associated with the bone white sterility of the moon, whereas Isis is the name
of the resurrecting Egyptian sun goddess, ISIS is deterministically nihilist,
because it’s rejective of life. Christianity, however, perceives itself as the expert
on Resurrection, because Jesus ‘Christ’, the Jewish Messiah, was taken to the
hill of Calvary outside the city of Jerusalem by agents of the Roman Empire
then occupying Jewish Palestine for preaching, ‘Love your neighbor as you love
yourself.’ (Mk: 12. 31) Nailed to a
cross of wood, and left there to die as a ‘dissident’, Jesus experienced
Resurrection and Ascension to heaven, because he was born of his mother, the
Virgin Mary, so represented the future Resurrection and Ascension of ‘woman’s
seed` to colonize the planets amongst the stars. The futanarian human species
of ‘woman’s seed’ capable of sexually reproducing humans between women was what
men had repressed. Although Sigmund Freud identified ‘penis envy’1 as the root
of a young girl’s problematic psychology, he didn’t understand that it was her
race that had been made almost extinct by men, so she was angry at not having a
penis of her own, which futanarian women have. In short, Christianity is an
instance of coprophile criticism, because Jesus’ teaching has been repressed in
favor of a simplistic convenience.
Although ISIS, and
ISIL, which was a title adopted by, amongst others, Moslem Russian Chechnyans
in the Caucasus, who wanted an Independent State in the Levant (ISIL) where
Jewish Palestine is situated, represent a concern with borders, it’s the
borders of death cards for ‘woman’s seed` that’s the real issue. Russian
President Vladimir Putin warred on Chechnya to secure the city of Derbent at what’s
known as ‘the gateway to the East’, that is, the former Empire of Persia, which
became Iran and Iraq, where ISIS’ leader Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi was declared the
ruler of a new Islamic Caliphate in June 2014. Moreover, it was Russia’s
decision to withdraw its influence over Yugoslavia that resulted in the
Moslem-Christian wars for independent states in the region. During the Bosnian
war (1992-5), for example, 70, 000 Moslem women were placed in ‘rape camps’ by
Serbian Christian militia to ensure that a generation of newborn Moslems would
be male brained, that is, it was an act of extinction of ‘woman’s seed`,
because the human futanarian species of women was being targeted by those
concerned with securing their borders against her. In simple terms, humanity’s
borders were those of her death card, and her borders were being patrolled by
her death camp guards. Because Moslems were permitted of four wives, their
families were archetypal structures for the sexual reproduction of women
between women, which was Christianity didn’t want Islam. However, Islam’s
mistake was to equate men with humanity, that is, ISIS espoused the sterility
of the bone white moon, and with ‘There is no God but God’ as its emblem, whereas
the sun goddess Isis was the more ancient Egyptian symbol for life through
women which was legitimate. Or, in other words, the borders of women’s death guards
are an instance of the coprophile critic having achieved ascendancy over the
life of the author, Mohamed, and the text, the Koran.
Although the
terrorist attack by Saudi Arabia’s Osama Ben Laden’s Al Qaeda group operating
out of Afghanistan under the auspices of the notoriously misogynist Taliban
regime on September 11, 2001, has been interpreted as an instance of ‘rough
trade’2, that is, a brutal act of homosexuality directed against the World Trade
Center in New York city after the terrorists hijacked civil airliners to crash
into the Twin Tower of the WTC, 9/11’s events signaled the beginning of the
Levant’s wars. Because futanarian women are known for having huge penis, they’re
elephants to men, that is, the human species of ‘woman’s seed’ is the target of
their hunting. In short, 9/11’s events were aimed at provoking the United
States of America’s attack on the only family unit to provide the possibility
of human sexual reproduction between women, that is, Moslem Islam’s. Because
Iraq’s dictator, Saddam Hussein, whose army had previously invaded Kuwait in
what was known as ‘the rape of Kuwait` in 1990, before it was ejected by the US’
army in 1991, publicly espoused Al Qaeda, the US ‘ army invaded and deposed him
in March 2003, but the result was Iraqi Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi’s ISIS, that is,
an instance of coprophile criticism, whereby the sterile bone white moon became
associated with the Egyptian sun goddess, Isis, who wasn’t a symbol of her
human species’ death. In other words, because the male brain is dyslexic it
misinterpreted the text. Repressed into unconsciousness, futanarian ‘woman’s
seed` represent the only possibility for the sexual reproduction of a
psychologically balanced and conscious human race. However, manufactured as a
single male brained creature wearing each other’s clothes in ‘TV’ transvestism
for an alien to watch in ‘TV wars’ against itself, the human species can’t analyze
its authors and texts well enough to avoid being exterminated in coprophilia.
1 Sigmund Freud, On Sexuality (PFL 7), p. 195-6.