Khidr Was A
Scientist, Moses Was A Believer
The reason
for the separation between Islam, which came after Jesus’ teaching, and wasn’t
Christianity, and Judaism, isn’t clear to everyone, although there are clues in
the Koran (610-30 C.E.) given to the
Prophet Mohamed, according to Islamic tradition, by the angels. The Koran contains some of the historical
circumstances and personages contained in the Hebrew Old Testament of what the Christians call their Bible, which also contains the New Testament teaching of Jesus, that
is, ‘Love your neighbor as you love yourself.’ (Mk: 12. 31) In the Koran,
Jesus is Isa and Mary is Mariam, and the stories are similar, although not in perfect agreement. In the Old Testament,
which is the history and law of the Jews, that is, the Talmud and Torah, Moses is
the leader of the Jews during their exodus from slavery in Egypt to the Pharaoh
Thutmose III, who pursues the Jews to the Red Sea, which divides to allow the
Jews to cross over into the land that God promised them, Palestine, thereby
demonstrating the power of God, and doubly so because the pursuing army of the
Egyptians is drowned as the waters close behind the Jews. Whether the event is
a powerful demonstration of some extramundane factor, or a technological
miracle, is immaterial in practical terms. The point is that the Jews left
Egypt and arrived in Palestine. In the Koran
Moses and Joshua, who is depicted in the Old
Testament as surviving Moses to go on into Palestine and bring down the
walls of the city of Jericho in a battle to conquer the country, are sojourning
by the Red Sea when Joshua loses the fish that they’d been keeping for their
supper. The figure of Khidr appears and Joshua and Moses decide to travel with
him. Khidr allows this but tells them that, if they don’t bear with him in
peace, they must leave.
Khidr rebuilds a wall beneath which is buried
treasure and, in response to Moses’ perturbation, explains that the treasure
wasn’t yet ready to be found, which is probably a literary reference to
Joshua’s demolishing of the walls of the city of Jericho where the predecessors
of Islam dwelt, that is, the Palestinians. The nature of the treasure that
wasn’t yet ready to be found relates to the
story of Jesus in the New
Testament who was born from his mother, the Virgin Mary, uncontaminated by
male semen. Depicted in Christian iconography as crushing the head of the
serpent with her foot, Jesus is Mary’s foot, because futanarian women can
sexually reproduce with each other through their own penis’ semen, and can also
self-fertilize their own womb. Consequently, the Old Testament depiction of the emergence of the first woman, Eve,
from the side or rib of the first man, Adam, was a euphemism for woman’s
self-fertilization. When Jesus was taken
to the hill of Calvary outside the city of Jerusalem by agents of the Empire of
Rome then occupying Palestine, he was nailed to a cross of wood, but
experienced Resurrection and Ascension to heaven in prefiguration of that of
‘woman’s seed’. Consequently, ‘woman’s seed’ is the treasure, which is
described as ‘the pearl of great price’, that is, heaven, is what the monogamy
obsessed Judeo-Christians weren’t ready for.
Khidr goes on to kill a child, which perturbs
Moses, and Khidr explains that the child was evil. Then Khidr makes holes in
ships before taking another and embarking on a voyage. Moses is perturbed
again, and Khidr explains that he doesn’t want to be followed by slavers. Moses
and Joshua then agree to leave, because Khidr has explained that the
Judeo-Christians believe in host womb slaving the human futanarian species of
‘woman’s seed` whereas Islam doesn’t. Separation between Judeo-Christianity and
Islam began with the founding of Judaism by Isaac, son of Abraham and his wife,
Sara, who barren thereafter gave her maid, Hajer, to Abraham, and Hajer bore
Ishmael, who was the founder of Islam through his descendant Mohamed. Although
Judeo-Christianity views the four wives of the Moslem peoples of the nations of
Islam as a retroactive attempt to legitimize Ishmael’s birth from an unmarried
woman, Hajer, it affords the possibility of human sexual reproduction between
futanarian ‘woman’s seed’ with a family tradition, and so is a closer
approximation to God’s plan, which was to make the human host greater than the
angelic. In short, that’s the ‘treasure’ which Judeo-Christianity couldn’t
countenance, although Jesus’ teaching perfectly accords with the plan. Caught
by his disciple, Judas, with a woman, Judas suggests that the ‘perfume’ be sold.
However, Jesus rebukes him: `Leave her alone.’ (Mk: 14. 6) Judas’ response is to betray Jesus to the Jewish
religious police, the Pharisees, for ‘thirty pieces of silver’ as a ‘dissident’
threat to the male brained Empire slaving the human futanarian species of
women’s host womb for parasitism upon ‘woman’s seed`, and the result is Jesus’
execution.
In the Old
Testament, the angel, Satan, is depicted as having rejected God’s plan that
the human host be greater than the angelic, and so has been transformed into a
serpent by God and placed in the paradise of heaven on Earth that is Eden where
it tempts Eve to ‘eat of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and
evil’, which it is death to taste. In accepting the fruit, Eve and Adam doom
their succeeding generations to slavery in ephemerality to what God identifies
as the ‘seed’ of the serpent, that is, men, because the human futanarian
species of ‘woman’s seed` are women, which is what God tells Eve, after telling
her she’ll have ‘enmity’ with the serpent’s ‘seed’: `You shall crush the head
of the serpent with your foot, but he will bruise your heel.’ It will be difficult
for her race to run to colonize the planets among the stars of heaven above the
Earth. That it’s ‘woman’s seed` God plans for is evident from the presence by
the Ark of the Covenant in the tent of the tabernacle of the Jews on their way
to the land promised by God of the Shekinah, that is, ‘the feminine spirit of
God’, who is represented as guiding the Jews as well as dwelling near the place
where the law of God given to Moses on ten tablets of stone are kept. All of
the commandments relate to theft in some way, for example, ‘Thou shalt not
steal.’ (Ex: 20. 15) Although the
eleventh commandment is overlooked, because the focus is on the number of
tablets, rather than the number of commandments, it completes the theme, ‘Thou
shalt not kill.’ (Ex: 20. 13) Stealing
is murder, that is, the taking of life from another. Consequently, the eleventh
commandment is, ‘… do not go up to my altar on steps, or your private parts may
be exposed.’ (Ex: 20. 26) In other
words, cannibalism is common, and God has seen that it is, because ‘woman’s
seed` is scarce, for example, God kills Onan, and his brother before him for
unspecified wickedness, because Onan refused to impregnate his dead brother’s
wife, Tamar, not because Onan was a masturbator, but because Tamar was a member
of the human species who’d had its penis eaten by the ‘serpent’s seed’ of men,
who’re labeled quite early in the Old
Testament book of Genesis when
Cain kills Abel for being able to cook, which is more pleasing to God’s
developmental plan, although Cain’s plan accords with Judas’, that is, slave
the species, and eat it on the altar where it’s learned to cook meat.
Abel was a scientist, and Cain was a slaver.
Consequently, the Khidr of the Koran
is a scientist, and Moses is a believer, which is why there’s some hope for
him. He believes in the law of God, which forbids cannibalism in host species’
womb parasitism. Since ancient times Christians have been handicapped by
notions of demoniacal and devilish contraptions, for example, ‘Luddites’, who
owed their name to Ned Ludd, a mill worker, who broke machinery in 1779,
because he said it made men redundant, whereas technology liberates the
individual. Consequently, for Christians scientists are Satanists, because
they’re believers, rather than scientists. In simple terms, television is
Satanism, because it’s science. Paradoxically, this view holds some truth.
Manufactured as a single male brained creature wearing each other’s clothes in ‘TV’
transvestism, men and women without ‘woman’s seed` constitute Satanism, because
they prefer war to women. In ancient Greece, for example, women’s host wombs
were institutionally enslaved for the production of boy sons for war through
homosexuality in pederasty. Once the enslavement of the human futanarian
species of ‘woman’s seed’ was established, the future was Empire and war. By
the late 20th century, the
tool for keeping women in monogamy through fear, and so for host womb
slavery, were the new poisons of homosexuality in pederasty’s ‘biological
weapon’, HIV/AIDS, discovered by DR Congo in Africa in 1983 and spread through
men’s mixing of blood, shit and semen in each other’s anus in mockery of
women’s human mode of sexual reproduction. In short, for Christians scientists
are Satanists because ‘woman’s seed’ isn’t admitted by the mass entertainment
media, although that’s contrary to God’s plan. Or, in other words, Christians
are Satanists, who’re ‘TV war’, because they believe in God not science.
Homosexuality in pederasty for war is an
illness subsumable under the label ‘pedophilia’, where pedophiles want
children, and so immortally youthful adult humans, who’d be women and ‘woman’s
seed`, aren’t on the pedophile’s agenda for the future of the human race in
nihilism, because the planets and stars that beckon couldn’t possibly be
reached or governed by an administration of ephemeral infantiles, who prefer
breeding boy sons, and manufacturing poisons, for war, to colonization of the
planets among the stars through the devising of starships to carry them there.
Although pornography is condemned roundly by society labeling it as encouraging
of adultery, in fact men are women’s adulterate. Consequently, where what is
termed pornographic representations of human sexual activity is in fact a
user’s manual for how to slave the human host womb of the species of futanarian
‘woman’s seed`, such imagery is educational for women, who’d perceive it as
essential edutainment denied them by their slavers. Or, in simple terms,
morality, which is the perception of what constitutes good and evil, isn’t
based on adultery for a human race that’s single and independent of its host
womb being owned by an alien. Having life taken, and being life eaten, are the
issues upon which morality is actually based.
The Koran
differs from the New Testament of
Jesus in that Jesus is depicted as being crucified and then experiences
Resurrection and Ascension to heaven, whereas in the Koran there’s a man who was called Jesus, who was crucified, but he
wasn’t Jesus, who walked into the paradise of heaven on Earth because he was a
teacher in Islam. Although the discrepancy seems curious it relates to the idea
that the torturer isn’t Jesus. In Christianity, Jesus is depicted as redeeming
the torturer, that is, those who torture are redeemed through their torture,
which is Satanism. Consequently, Islam distinguishes between the tortured man,
who was called Jesus, and the man who was Jesus, who wasn’t tortured, because
he was watching his ‘brother’ being tortured. From an Islamic point of view,
the crucified Jesus was being punished by the law, whereas Jesus, the Islamic
teacher, wasn’t. In simple terms, for Moslems the law is all that’s important. As
Onan’s brother was killed by God for unspecified wickedness, that is, he didn’t
impregnate Tamar either, so Isa’s brother was killed by God for specific
reasons to do with the law, that is, as ‘woman’s seed`, Jesus wasn’t a ‘brother’
Moslem, which is the reason for the distinction between the ‘brothers’, who
tortured a man called Jesus, and who wasn’t Isa, because Isa was with the
torturers, and the Christian Jesus, who experienced Resurrection and Ascension
to heaven in prefiguration of that of ‘woman’s seed’, because he was tortured,
and so returned to smite the evil, and impose upon them God’s judgment of
‘eternal unendurable pain’, that is, perdition: ‘And out of his mouth goeth a
sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them
with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath
of almighty God.’ (Rev: 19. 15)
The fish, Leviathan, is described in the Bible as Satan, and God asks, ‘Can you
pull in Leviathan with a fishhook?’ (Job:
41. 1) If the cross was the fishhook, then it’s a symbol of Satan, whereas
Leviathan is freedom, which Jesus represents. Khidr is the fish that got away,
that is, he was wise to being put on the hook to catch Satan, because only the
brothers of torture would want it for Jesus, who preferred freedom for himself
and others. In short, Jesus on the cross was on a meat hook from the
perspective of the ‘brothers’, because to them that was what the human
futanarian species of ‘woman’s seed’ was for. Consequently, the early
Christians used the fish as their sign, because Khidr was a wise scientist with
a time machine, and so wasn’t hooked by the butcher’s for having one.